############### Project grading ############### To receive an "A" on this assignment you will need to have roughly eight check marks and three check pluses. +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | | ✓- | ✓ | ✓+ | +================+=====================================+=====================================+===========================================+ | Questions | Questions overly simplistic, | Questions appropriate, coherent, | Questions well motivated, | | | unrelated, or unmotivated | and motivated | interesting, insightful, and novel | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Analysis | Choice of analysis is overly | Analysis appropriate | Analysis appropriate, complete, | | | simplistic or incomplete | | advanced, and informative | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Results | Conclusions are missing, | Conclusions relevant, but partially | Relevant conclusions explicitly | | | incorrect, or not based on | correct or partially complete. | tied to analysis and to context. | | | analysis. | Plots convey information but lack | Plots convey information | | | Inappropriate choice of | context for interpretation | correctly with adequate and | | | plots; poorly labeled plots; | | appropriate reference | | | plots missing | | information | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Collaboration | Only a few members | All members contributed | All members contributed | | | contributed substantial | substantial effort and | substantial effort to each | | | effort or members each | everyone contributed to all | project aspect | | | only worked on part of | aspects of project | | | | project | | | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Tests | Tests incomplete, incorrect, or | Tests cover most of the project | Extensive and | | | missing | code | comprehensive testing | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Code review | Pull requests not adequately used, | Pull requests adequately used, | Code review substantial | | | reviewed, or improved | reviewed, and improved | and extensive | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Documentation | Poorly documented | Adequately documented | Well documented | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Readability | Code readability inconsistent or | Code readability consistent and | Code readability excellent | | | poor | good quality | | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Organization | Poorly organized and structured | Reasonably organized and clear | Elegant and transparent | | | repository | structure | code organization | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Presentation | Verbal presentation is | Verbal presentation partially | Verbal presentation is | | | illogical, incorrect, or | correct but incomplete or | correct, complete, | | | incoherent. | unconvincing. | and convincing. | | | Visual presentation is | Visual presentation is | Visual presentation is | | | cluttered, disjoint, or | readable and clear. | appealing, informative, | | | illegible. | Verbal and visual | and crisp. | | | Verbal and visual | presentation related | Verbal and visual | | | presentation unrelated | | presentation clearly related | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Writing | Explanation is illogical, | Explanation is correct, complete, | Explanation is correct, complete, | | | incorrect, or incoherent | and convincing | convincing, and elegant | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Reproduciblity | Code didn't run, or README recipe | README recipe fetches data, | README recipes additionally generate | | | does not specify steps to reproduce | validates fetched data, | all EDA work and supplementary | | | results and figures in project | generates all results and | analysis. Recipes short, simple | | | report | figures in report | and well automated with few manual steps. | +----------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ See also :doc:`participate`.